Azalea Triage

Azalea Triage

$70,000.00
Sale price  $70,000.00 Regular price 
Skip to product information
Azalea Triage

Azalea Triage

$70,000.00
Sale price  $70,000.00 Regular price 

 

Azalea Triage Intelligent patient routing engine

Azalea Triage ingests unstructured patient-submitted symptoms and requests, performs urgency classification, and routes each case to the appropriate clinical or operational queue via configurable rules and model-driven scoring.

Technical capabilities:

  • Input processing: Parses free-text symptom descriptions, structured intake forms, and patient requests (portal messages, chat, phone transcripts) into normalized case records
  • Urgency classification: Applies a clinical acuity model to score and categorize cases (e.g., emergent / urgent / routine / administrative), with configurable thresholds per care setting
  • Routing logic: Directs cases to the correct destination — clinical team, care coordinator, billing/admin queue, or escalation pathway — based on classification output plus configurable business rules (specialty, provider availability, payer, location)
  • Escalation handling: Flags time-sensitive or high-acuity cases for immediate human review, with configurable SLAs and alerting
  • Auditability: Logs classification rationale and routing decisions for clinical oversight, QA, and compliance review
  • Integration: Designed to sit alongside existing EHR/telehealth intake systems, consuming inbound patient data and pushing routed cases into downstream queues or task systems
  • Human-in-the-loop: Supports override and correction workflows so staff can adjust routing decisions, which can feed back into model tuning

Deployment considerations: Intended for environments with defined clinical escalation protocols and staff review capacity for high-acuity flags; not intended as a standalone diagnostic or autonomous clinical decision-making tool.

Pricing: $70,000

Azalea Triage Intelligent patient routing engine

System Architecture

1. Ingestion Layer

  • Multi-channel intake adapters (patient portal API, SMS/chat webhook, telephony transcript feed, structured EHR intake forms)
  • Normalization service converts heterogeneous inputs into a unified case schema (patient ID, timestamp, source channel, raw text, structured fields)
  • PHI-aware preprocessing with field-level encryption at ingestion

2. Classification Engine

  • NLP pipeline: named-entity recognition for symptom/condition extraction, negation detection (e.g., "no chest pain"), temporal reasoning (symptom onset/duration)
  • Acuity scoring model: gradient-boosted or transformer-based classifier trained on clinically labeled triage data, outputting a calibrated urgency score (0–1) mapped to categorical bands (emergent / urgent / routine / administrative)
  • Confidence thresholding: low-confidence classifications auto-route to human review queue rather than forcing a decision
  • Model versioning and shadow-mode deployment support for safe rollout of updated classifiers

3. Routing Orchestrator

  • Rules engine (declarative, e.g. YAML/JSON-configured) layered on top of model output — combines acuity score with business logic (specialty match, provider capacity, payer/network rules, geographic/location constraints)
  • Priority queueing with weighted fairness to prevent starvation of lower-urgency cases
  • Destination adapters push routed cases to downstream systems (EHR task lists, care coordination platforms, admin ticketing systems) via REST/HL7 FHIR/webhook

4. Escalation & Alerting

  • Real-time alerting service (push/SMS/pager integration) triggered on emergent classifications
  • Configurable SLA timers with breach notifications
  • Dead-letter queue for failed routing attempts, with automatic retry and fallback-to-human-review

5. Human-in-the-Loop Layer

  • Override interface for staff to reclassify or reroute cases
  • Correction events captured as labeled training data for periodic model retraining
  • Reviewer audit trail (who overrode what, when, rationale)

6. Observability & Compliance

  • Structured decision logs (input features, model output, rule matches, final routing) retained for audit and QA
  • Metrics pipeline tracking classification accuracy, routing latency, escalation response time, override rate
  • Access controls and encryption aligned with HIPAA data handling requirements; full audit logging for compliance review

7. Integration Surface

  • Inbound: EHR/telehealth intake APIs, patient portals, messaging platforms
  • Outbound: FHIR-compatible case objects, task/queue systems, alerting/paging services
  • Sync/async modes supported depending on downstream system capabilities

Pricing: $70,000

Here's a price breakdown for Azalea Triage at $70,000, structured across the typical cost categories for a system like this:

Category Description Estimated Cost
Core platform license Classification engine, routing orchestrator, escalation/alerting modules (annual license) $32,000
Implementation & integration EHR/telehealth intake connection, FHIR/HL7 adapters, downstream queue integration $14,000
Model configuration & tuning Acuity model calibration, rules engine setup, threshold tuning for care setting $8,500
Data migration & normalization Mapping existing intake formats into unified case schema $4,500
Compliance & security setup HIPAA-aligned access controls, encryption config, audit logging setup $5,000
Staff training & onboarding Human-in-the-loop workflows, override/correction interface training $3,000
First-year support & monitoring Observability dashboard, SLA monitoring, model performance reviews $3,000
Total $70,000

Notes on structure:

  • This assumes a first-year all-in price (license + implementation), which is typical for enterprise healthcare software — renewal years are usually license + support only (often 60–70% of year-one cost, roughly $40–45K).
  • Actual weighting shifts based on deployment complexity — a single-clinic deployment skews toward implementation being smaller and license being a larger share; a multi-site health system deployment would push integration and compliance costs up.
  • Volume/case-count tiers aren't reflected here — if pricing is usage-based (e.g., per-case or per-provider), the breakdown would look different (e.g., platform fee + per-case rate).

You may also like